Privileged Access Manager Product Q&A
What business problems does Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager address?
Many organizations have insecure processes for managing privileged accounts -- IDs and passwords on servers, workstations, applications and network devices with elevated privileges. Inappropriate disclosure of these passwords would lead to serious security compromise:
- Hundreds or thousands of workstations and servers often share the same ID and password. If the password on one device is compromised, all of the devices that share the credential are compromised.
- Where a password is used on many systems or needed by many people, it is difficult to coordinate password changes. As a result, passwords on privileged accounts are often left unchanged for months or years, creating an extended window of opportunity for an attacker.
- If privileged passwords are rarely changed, when IT staff leave an organization, they retain access to sensitive systems.
- When many people know the password to a given account, it is impossible to reliably connect changes (or security compromises) to individual users.
How does Privileged Access Manager work?
There are several technological approaches to more securely managing privileged passwords:
Eliminate shared passwords entirely and assign personal
administrator-level accounts to each IT user, on each asset.
Individual accountability for configuration changes.
|Too many administrator-level accounts on each system.|
Create and delete personal administrator-level accounts for
users on demand.
Individual accountability for configuration changes.
|Complex integration between many systems and the corporate directory.|
Modify operating systems and applications to check whether users
are allowed to perform privileged actions, in real time. Manage access
control policies centrally.
Fine-grained control over user access.
|Too many administrator-level accounts on each system plus complex change control on each system.|
Use software installed on each device to periodically change
local passwords. Send a copy of these passwords to a secure vault,
shared by many systems.
Works even in complex, segmented networks.
|Requires software on each managed system.|
Software on a central system periodically pushes
new passwords to each device and keeps copies in a secure vault.
Minimal footprint on managed systems.
|Requires connectivity from a central application to managed systems.|
How often does Privileged Access Manager change passwords?
This is configurable, with the default being every 24 hours.
Privileged Access Manager secures sensitive passwords by periodically randomizing them:
- On push-mode servers and applications:
- Periodically -- for example, every night between 3AM and 4AM.
- When users check passwords back in, after they are finished using them.
- When users request a specific password value.
- In the event of an urgent termination of a system administrator.
- On pull-mode workstations and other devices:
- Periodically -- for example, every day.
- At a random time-of-day, to prevent transaction bursts.
- Opportunistically, whenever network connectivity happens to be available from the workstation to a central server.
How do we control who can sign into which privileged accounts?
The most common form of access control in the Privileged Access Manager is based on managed system policies. These policies are named collections of managed systems containing privileged accounts whose passwords may be randomized and access to which is controlled.
Managed systems may either be attached to a policy explicitly (e.g., "attach workstation WKSTN01234 to policy RGWKSTNS") or implicitly, using an expression. Expressions may be based on the operating system type, IP address, MAC address or workstation name (e.g., "attach every workstation running Windows XP in subnet 10.1.2.3/24 to policy X")
Managed system policies are configured with operational and access control rules, including:
- Which accounts' passwords to randomize on attached systems.
- How often to change passwords.
- How to compose random passwords (e.g., length, complexity, etc.).
- What actions to take after successful or failed attempts to disclose a password.
- What access disclosure methods to offer users who wish to sign into privileged accounts on attached systems (e.g., launch remote desktop, launch SSH, temporarily place user in security groups, display current password to user, etc.).
Privileged Access Manager users are organized into user groups, either explicitly or implicitly. In a typical deployment, users are assigned to Privileged Access Manager user groups by virtue of their membership in Active Directory or LDAP groups. Groups of users are then assigned specific rights with respect to specific managed system policies. For example, "every user in group A may launch RDP sessions to privileged accounts on systems in policy B."
Business rules, such as segregation of duties between different sets of users, can also be enforced. This is done by examining, managing and limiting group membership on reference systems, such as Active Directory or LDAP, that can be simultaneously assigned to the same user.
How do we grant someone temporary or one-time access to a privileged account?
Privileged Access Manager includes the same authorization workflow engine as is used in Hitachi ID Identity Manager. Workflow enables users to request access to a privileged account that was not previously or permanently authorized. When this happens, one or more additional users are invited (via e-mail or SMS) to review and approve the request. Approved requests trigger a message to the request's recipient, including a URL to Privileged Access Manager where he or she can re-authenticate and "check out" access.
The workflow process is illustrated by the following series of steps:
- User UA signs in and requests that the then-current password to login account LA on system S be made available to user UB at some later time T. UA may or may not be the same person as UB.
- Privileged Access Manager looks up authorizers associated with LA on S.
- Privileged Access Manager may run business logic to supplement this authorizer list, for example with someone in the management chain for UA or UB. The final list of authorizers is LA. There are N authorizers but approval by just M (M <= N) is sufficient to disclose the password to AZ.
- Privileged Access Manager sends e-mail invitations to authorizers LA.
- If authorizers fail to respond, they get automatic reminder e-mails.
- If authorizers continue to fail to respond, Privileged Access Manager runs business logic to find replacements for them, effectively escalating the request and invites the replacement authorizers as well.
- Authorizers receive invitation e-mails, click on a URL embedded in the e-mail invitation, authenticate themselves to the Privileged Access Manager web login page, review the request and approve or reject it.
- If any authorizers reject the request, e-mails are sent to all participants (UA, UB and AZ) and the request is terminated.
- If M authorizers approve the request, thank-you e-mails are sent to all participants. A special e-mail is sent to the recipient -- UB with a URL to an access disclosure page.
- UB clicks on the e-mail URL and authenticates to Privileged Access Manager and displays the password.
- UB clicks on a button to "check-out privileged access."
- UB then may click on a button to do one of the following (the options
available will vary based on policy):
- Display the password.
- Place a copy of the password in the operating system copy buffer.
- Launch an RDP, SSH, vSphere or similar remote control session to the server in question.
In other words, display of a sensitive password is not a mandatory or even recommended part of the solution.
Can we configure a "two keys to launch" scenario for super-sensitive systems?
Privileged Access Manager supports approval of change requests by multiple business stake-holders and/or by multiple groups of business stake-holders. This allows for typical scenarios such as "approve this request by recipient's manager plus departmental IT contact plus application owner."
Since individuals may be unavailable to respond to a request, authorization can substitute groups for single approvers. Thus, the above example may be reformulated as "approve this request by recipient's manager or any of the manager's peers; plus either of two departmental IT contacts; plus any of three designated security contacts for the indicated application."
Change authorization is normally conducted by sending invitations to all authorizers at the same time. This "parallel" invitation process yields faster approval turn-around times but has no impact on security, since all requisite approvers must respond before a request is completed. Sequential invitations are also possible but are not recommended by Hitachi ID Systems due to the longer total time elapsed before all participants will approve or reject a request.
Can Privileged Access Manager manage password changes to Windows service accounts?
On the Windows operating system, service programs are run either using the SYSTEM login ID, which possesses almost every privilege on the system (and consequently can do the maximum harm) and which has no password or using a real user's login ID and password, in order to execute with reduced privileges. This means that on each Windows workstation and server there are a number of service accounts, each with its own password, which are used to run service programs such as web servers, backup agents, anti-virus software, etc.
Service account passwords differ from administrator passwords in that they are stored in at least two places:
- Hashed, in the security database -- e.g., the local SAM database or Active Directory, just like all users.
- Reversibly encrypted, in the registry or elsewhere, where the program that starts the service (e.g., Service Control Manager or similar) can retrieve it when it needs to start the service.
Other Windows components besides the Service Control Manager also store passwords twice:
- Virtual directories used to access web content from the IIS web server.
- Programs scheduled to be run by the Windows Scheduler.
Third party programs may also require passwords to be stored outside the Security Accounts Manager (SAM) database.
Of the above passwords, all but those used in IIS are static and may represent a security vulnerability.
Privileged Access Manager can be configured to secure service account passwords. This means two things, depending on the mode of operation:
- In pull mode, the Privileged Access Manager workstation service periodically scrambles service account passwords locally, in coordination with the central Privileged Access Manager server cluster.
- In push mode, Privileged Access Manager servers periodically connect to Windows servers in order to change the passwords of service accounts.
In both cases, Privileged Access Manager notifies the program that launches service accounts of the new password value, so that it can successfully launch the service at the time of the next system restart or when an administrator manually stops and restarts the service in question.
In push mode, Privileged Access Manager runs an exit program which remotely connects to the server in question and updates the secondary storage of the service password. Exit programs are provided with the base Privileged Access Manager software distribution to remotely update:
- The Windows Service Control manager.
- The Windows Scheduler.
- The IIS web server (anonymous user, application pools).
- DCOM objects (e.g., ODBC data sources).
Privileged Access Manager does not normally restart services after notifying the appropriate OS component of a new password, since the new password is normally only required when the service is next started -- not immediately. However, Privileged Access Manager can be configured to restart services on a selective basis, after a password change.
Any problems encountered in updating a service password can and should be configured to trigger an exit trap program on the Privileged Access Manager server, to notify an administrator of an imminent problem when the service in question is next started.
Privileged Access Manager product administrators can write additional exit programs to update service passwords used by other programs, stored in other locations. These are typically command-line programs (Windows executable or script) that run on the Privileged Access Manager server.
In pull mode, the Privileged Access Manager workstation service can use a DLL to update local passwords. DLLs are provided for the same Windows components as the push-mode exits above and implementers can write new DLLs to update passwords for other types of accounts.
Can Privileged Access Manager randomize passwords on ....?
Privileged Access Manager comes with built-in connectors for most common systems and applications, as illustrated below. All connectors are included in the base price.
Any LDAP, AD, NDS, eDirectory, NIS/NIS+.
Windows 2000--2008, Samba, NetWare, SharePoint.
Oracle, Sybase, SQL Server, DB2/UDB, ODBC.
Linux, Solaris, AIX, HPUX, 24 more.
z/OS with RAC/F, ACF/2 or TopSecret.
iSeries (OS400), OpenVMS.
Tokens, Smart Cards:
JDE, Oracle eBiz, PeopleSoft, SAP R/3, Siebel, Business Objects.
Lotus Notes, Exchange, GroupWise, BlackBerry ES.
RSA SecurID, SafeWord, RADIUS, ActivIdentity, Schlumberger.
CA Siteminder, IBM TAM, Oracle AM, RSA Access Manager.
BMC Remedy, BMC SDE, HP Service Manager, CA Unicenter, Assyst, HEAT, Altiris, etc.
McAfee, CheckPoint, PGP.
Salesforce.com, WebEx, Google Apps, Microsoft 365.
OLAP, Hyperion, iLearn, Caché.
SSH, Telnet, TN3270, HTTP(S), SQL, LDAP, command-line.
(2)Privileged Access Manager includes a number of flexible connectors, each of which is used to script integration with a common protocol or mechanism. These connectors allow organizations to quickly and inexpensively integrate Privileged Access Manager with custom and vertical market applications. The ability to quickly and inexpensively add integrations increases the value of the Privileged Access Manager system as a whole.
There are flexible connectors to script interaction with:
Back end integration:
Organizations that wish to write a completely new connector to integrate with a custom or vertical market application may do so using whatever development environment they prefer (J2EE, .NET, Perl, etc.) and invoke it as either a command-line program or web service.
If Hitachi ID Systems customer develops their own integrations, an effort of between four hours and four days is typical. Alternately, Hitachi ID Systems offers fixed-cost custom integrations for a nominal fee.
Can Privileged Access Manager launch an administrator login sessions to ....?
Privileged Access Manager controls access by users and programs to privileged accounts on systems and applications. By default, that means that when a user is authorized to connect to a privileged account, the user is able to launch a login session directly to that account without ever seeing its password.
Display of current password values can be enabled through Privileged Access Manager policy configuration but is not normally recommended.
Access disclosure options include:
- IT staff can directly launch Terminal Services (RDP), SSH (PuTTY), VMWare vSphere, SQL Studio and other connections to target systems from the Privileged Access Manager web user interface, without displaying a password value.
- IT staff can use an ActiveX control embedded in the Privileged Access Manager web portal to place a copy of a sensitive password into their Windows copy buffer, again without displaying the passwords. This password is automatically cleared from their copy buffer after a few seconds.
- Privileged Access Manager can dynamically attach a recipient's Active Directory domain login ID to a local security group on a target system and later remove it. This eliminates the need to disclose passwords even to a software agent on the recipient's workstation.
- Privileged Access Manager can temporarily place a user's public SSH key into the target account's .ssh/authorized_keys file.
A policy defined for each set of managed systems in Privileged Access Manager determines which of these access disclosure mechanisms is available. For example, password display may be allowed for Windows workstations, since they may be inaccessible over the network, but RDP sessions with injected passwords may be mandatory on Windows servers.
What happens when an administrator needs to sign into the physical console of a server?
Password display is supported. Hitachi ID Systems recommends limiting the set of people who have access to this -- i.e., only data center staff should be able to display passwords and perhaps only with workflow approvals.
Which web browsers does Privileged Access Manager support?
Basic user interface
This interface ensures compatibility with all web browsers. Privileged Access Manager's web user interface is routinely and successfully tested using:
- Internet Explorer versions 7.x and later (IE6 works may have rendering artifacts and in any case both Hitachi ID Systems and Microsoft want to encourage users to upgrade this horrible old browser).
- Firefox versions 3.0 and later.
- Safari, Chrome and other WebKit-based browsers.
- Opera (full and mini versions).
- Browsers on smart phones (BlackBerry native, Safari on iPhone, native, Dolphin, Opera and Firefox on Android, etc.).
- Even text mode browsers such as lynx and w3m.
The Privileged Access Manager user interface is compatible and periodically tested with speaking web browsers (for the visually impaired).
In addition to standard HTML, Hitachi ID Password Manager can take advantage of ActiveX components specifically in IE to execute local code. Example uses of this optional capability include:
- To update cached passwords on corporate Windows laptops, after a successful password change.
- To notify full disk encryption software of a new primary Windows password, as FDE and Windows primary login passwords are normally synchronized.
- To notify enterprise single sign-on programs of new application passwords, so that they can update their "wallet."
In addition to standard HTML, Privileged Access Manager can take advantage of ActiveX components specifically in IE to execute local code. Example uses of this optional capability include:
- To launch login sessions to privileged accounts on managed systems and inject credentials into those login sessions (e.g., PuTTY, RDP, SQL, vSphere, etc.).
- To record screen, keyboard, webcam and other data during the life of such login sessions.
ActiveX components used to launch login sessions
ActiveX can be used (but is not required) to:
- Launch connections from administrator PCs to target systems (RDP, SSH, SQL Studio, VMWare vSphere, etc.) without having to disclose privileged passwords to users and without users having to type login IDs and passwords for the privileged accounts on systems they need to sign into. Any command-line client software, plus the RDP control built into Windows, can be activated in this way.
- Place a copy of a privileged password in a user's copy buffer and automatically remove it after a short time, without having to display it. This allows administrators to (briefly) paste a sensitive password into a login prompt without having to see it.
IE7 and later are supported as a platform to launch connections via ActiveX (IE6 also works but like all vendors, Hitachi ID Systems would prefer that IE6 disappeared as soon as possible).
Using ActiveX to launch administrator login sessions means the connection is directly from the user's PC to the managed system -- not though a proxy. This means there is no bottleneck for performance or service availability. It also means that Privileged Access Manager can launch a variety of client/server administration tools and is not limited to specific versions of specific protocols.
Can Privileged Access Manager you secure privileged passwords on laptops (which move around and get disconnected)?
A password management system can easily make connections to servers, which have fixed network addresses, are always on and are continuously connected to the network. It is much harder for a central password management server to connect to mobile laptops, for several reasons:
- Laptops frequently move from site to site.
- Even when they remain in one place, laptop IP addresses may change dynamically, due to use of DHCP.
- Laptops are often turned off and do not respond to network inquiries when deactivated.
- Laptops may be unplugged from the network, either to move them or for periods of disuse.
- Laptops may be protected by a firewall that blocks network connections inbound to the PC.
In short, while it is easy for laptops to contact a central server, it is nearly impossible for the reverse to happen reliably.
To secure privileged accounts on mobile workstations (typically laptops), Privileged Access Manager includes a service, which installs on the relevant PCs and which contacts a central server to coordinate local password changes.
This architecture has several important advantages:
- The workstation service uses only HTTPS to communicate with the central server and works even when the workstation is connected behind NAT devices, firewalls or application proxies.
- The workstation service does not randomize passwords unless it has established connectivity with the central privileged access management server. This avoids a situation where the central server does not know the new password value for a workstation.
- Dynamic IP addresses have no impact on this architecture.
- Physical relocation and long periods of detached network connectivity may delay updates to local passwords, but do not introduce a failure whereby the local administrator passwords on a workstation are unknown.
Privileged Access Manager supports management of passwords on laptops, which may be mobile, have dynamic IP addresses, get unplugged, etc. This is done using client software, which works by "pulling" new, passwords from the Privileged Access Manager server cluster. Client software is available for:
- Windows 2000, XP, Windows Vista/7/8, 2003, 2008 and 2008R2.
- Unix (various vendors) and Linux (IA86).
The Windows pull-mode service includes plug-ins to notify operating system components of new service account passwords. Plug-ins are provided for the Windows Service Control Manager, Windows Scheduler and IIS.
How can we automate the setup and teardown of thousands of systems on Privileged Access Manager?
(3) In organizations with large numbers of servers, clearly it is desirable to auto-discover and auto-maintain a list of servers and lists of accounts to manage on each server, rather than manually adding and maintaining thousands of separate target systems and accounts.
To auto-discover servers, most organizations pull data from an Active Directory or LDAP directory. Computer objects discovered in the directory are classified based on their attributes and automatically managed (or not) and attached to appropriate managed system policies, which specify password change frequency, access control rules, access disclosure methods, etc.
A second auto-discovery process probes each managed system to find accounts that should be managed. On most systems, a list of local users and groups is generated. Specifically on Windows systems, this process also lists services, scheduled jobs, IIS anonymous access directories and DCOM objects and see what accounts are used to run each of them. Import rules determine which of these accounts will be managed by Privileged Access Manager (e.g., based on account attributes, group membership, security IDs, etc.) and which security policies to apply.
Alternatives to Active Directory- or LDAP-driven computer object lists include DNS queries or zone transfers, IP port scans of specific subnets and data imports from an inventory management system.
Privileged Access Manager also includes an automated mechanism to inform programs that store a copy of passwords of new password values. A plug-in program is provided to connect to Windows servers after each password change and automatically update Service Control Manager, Windows Scheduler, IIS or DCOM with new password values.
The Privileged Access Manager auto-discovery process is able to list, classify and probe over 10,000 systems per hour. It is normally scheduled to run daily.
Can Privileged Access Manager assign privileges less than full-administrator to users?
Yes. For Unix/Linux, please refer to the next question.
For Windows, see below.
Privileged Access Manager can be configured to disclose privileged access to Windows servers by temporarily placing an administrative user's unprivileged Active Directory domain account into a privileged security group on the target computer.
This process works as follows:
- Administrator A requests privileged access to computer C.
- The request is approved either because A has been pre-approved for such access (typically via membership in an AD group) or because some other user, with ownership rights to computer C, approves the request.
- Administrator A "checks out" access to computer C.
- Privileged Access Manager places A's AD account into a privileged group on computer C, such as (local group) "Administrators."
- A connects to C using RDP. This connection might be mediated by Privileged Access Manager, which can launch the RDP session directly from its web portal using an Active-X control.
- Depending on how Privileged Access Manager and C are configured, A may or may not have to type his personal AD password to establish the RDP connection to C. For example, if C trusts Kerberos-authenticated RDP sessions or if Privileged Access Manager has an agent on A's workstation to acquire his login password, then no manual authentication step will be required.
- Eventually A will either check-in the session or the session will time out. When either event happens, Privileged Access Manager will remove A's AD account from the privileged group on C.
This approach of manipulating group memberships rather than disclosing password has the advantage that audit logs on the target computer (C in the example above) show activity by the individual administrator (A in the example above) rather than by a generic local administrator account.
The limitations of this approach are:
- It does not help with non-Windows machines or non-domain-members.
- It does not help with machines which are disconnected from the network.
Can Privileged Access Manager interoperate with sudo on Unix/Linux?
Privileged Access Manager can be configured to disclose privileged access to Unix and Linux computers by temporarily placing an administrative user's personal SSH public key into the trusted keys file of a functional account on the target computer.
This architecture works as follows:
- The Privileged Access Manager server gets its own SSH public and private keys.
- Every user who may require privileged access to Unix/Linux systems
- An SSH client package on his PC.
- Defined SSH private and public key.
- A copy of the public SSH key for every user is kept on the Privileged Access Manager server.
- Each managed Unix/Linux computer is configured with:
- An SSHD listener.
- The SUDO package.
- A set of functional, unprivileged accounts (more on this later).
- The /etc/sudoers file on each managed Unix/Linux computer
is configured to grant a set of predefined privileges to each
functional account. For example:
- The account dba might be allowed to perform DB-related tasks.
- The account backup might be allowed to perform filesystem backups.
- The account procmon might be allowed to perform runaway processes.
- The account monitor might be allowed to perform stats from /proc.
- The .ssh/authorized_keys file of each of the functional accounts is configured to trust the public SSH key of the Privileged Access Manager server.
- At access checkout time, Privileged Access Manager modifies the .ssh/authorized_keys file of the functional account to which access was granted to include the public key of the user who needs access to that account.
- At access checkin or expiry time, Privileged Access Manager modifies the .ssh/authorized_keys file of the relevant functional account to remove the public key of the user who had access to that account.
The access disclosure process works as follows:
- Administrator A requests access to functional account F on computer C.
- The request is approved either because A has been pre-approved for such access (typically via membership in an AD group) or because some other user, with ownership rights to F@C, approves the request.
- Administrator A "checks out" access to F@C.
- Privileged Access Manager retrieves a copy of the .ssh/authorized_keys from F@C, adds A's public SSH key to the file and puts the new .ssh/authorized_keys back in F@C's home directory.
- A connects to F@C using SSH. This connection is authenticated using an SSH key exchange (not a password).
- A may have to type a password to access his own SSH private key, depending on how whether his SSH key is encrypted with his password.
- Eventually A will either check-in the session or the session will time out. When either event happens, Privileged Access Manager will remove A's public SSH key from F@C's .ssh/authorized_keys file.
Can Privileged Access Manager integrate with SIEM systems?
The logging service in Privileged Access Manager can be configured to forward SYSLOG messages to a network logging system, including services exposed by all popular SIEM applications.
How does Privileged Access Manager defend itself against compromise of sensitive passwords?
Encryption is used to protect stored Privileged Access Manager data as follows:
|Data stored on the Privileged Access Manager server|
|Privileged passwords, used to log into target systems||128-bit AES||128-bit random|
|Answers to security questions||128-bit AES||128-bit random|
|User old password history||SHA-1||64-bit random salt|
How do we protect Privileged Access Manager against data loss?
Once deployed, Privileged Access Manager becomes an essential part of an organization's IT infrastructure, since it alone has access to privileged passwords for thousands of networked devices. An interruption to the availability of Privileged Access Manager or its password vault would mean that administrative access to a range of devices is interrupted -- a major IT service disruption.
Since servers occasionally break down, Privileged Access Manager supports load balancing and data replication between multiple physical servers and multiple credential vaults. Any updates written to one database instance are automatically replicated, in real time, over an encrypted communication path, to all other Privileged Access Manager servers and all other credential vaults.
In short, Privileged Access Manager incorporates a highly available, replicated, multi-master architecture for both the application and the credential vault.
To provide out-of-the-box data replication, Privileged Access Manager includes a database service that replicates updates across multiple database instances. This service can be configured use either Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server databases for physical storage. Hitachi ID Systems recommends one physical database per Privileged Access Manager server, normally on the same hardware as the Privileged Access Manager application.
The Privileged Access Manager data replication system makes it both simple and advisable for organizations to build a highly-available Privileged Access Manager server cluster, spanning multiple servers, with each server placed in a different data center. Replication traffic is encrypted, authenticated, bandwidth-efficient and tolerant of latency, making it suitable for deployment over a WAN.
This multi-site, multi-master replication is configured at no additional cost, beyond that of the hardware for additional Privileged Access Manager servers, and with minimal manual configuration.
Can Privileged Access Manager record what users do while signed into administrator accounts?
Privileged Access Manager includes a sophisticated infrastructure for monitoring, recording and playing back privileged account login sessions. This includes capturing:
- Successive screen shots of the interactive administrator login session (RDP, SSH, vSphere, etc.).
- Periodic photographs of the user (presumably) if a web-cam is present.
- Many types of input events, including key presses, mouse clicks, copies and pastes.
- Process names started and stopped.
- UI text elements (labels, text input fields, drop-downs, etc.) displayed on the screen.
- Mapping and disconnecting file shares (currently under development).
- Initiating file transfers, especially to removable media such as USB flash drives (currently under development).
Capture sources can be individually enabled, disabled or configured.
This data is stored in a secure database and can be accessed later:
- Search by user, target system, time, date or meta data.
- Play back movies of user interaction.
- Report on events during the session (copy, paste, transfer file to removable media, etc.).
This data can be extracted, for example for use in a forensic audit or as courtroom evidence.
Two forms of this session monitoring/recording infrastructure are being developed concurrently:
- One runs when a privileged account login session is initiated via the Privileged Access Manager web portal, by launching an RDP session, SSH session, SQL Studio, a 3270 emulator, VMWare vSphere, etc.
- Another (in Beta release) can be installed on an individual Windows workstation or server (Windows XP, 2003, Vista, 2008, 2008R2, 7) and can record user interaction during an interactive login session by a specified user, even if the session was not initiated using Privileged Access Manager at all.
Recorded sessions are stored in a combination of the Privileged Access Manager database (session meta data, keyboard input and other text events, etc.) and on server or network filesystems (video captures, web-cam snapshots, etc.).
Playback data is packaged as a ZIP file with XML files representing textual data, standard MP4 video files representing screen movies and JPEG files representing web-cam images. These ZIP files are intended to be suitable as forensic evidence in the context of investigation of improper employee or contractor behavior.
How does Privileged Access Manager control access to recorded login sessions (privacy protection)?
Session monitoring can have serious implications on user privacy and so should be implemented with great care. The session monitoring infrastructure is subject to strict access control rules and workflow infrastructure. For example, an auditor must first request the right to perform a given search through session data. If approved, he can execute the search and may find sessions of interest. The auditor must then request the right to playback selected sessions. Only if this second request is approved can the auditor retrieve session data. Of course, all such requests and searches this is indelibly logged.