Hitachi ID Identity Manager includes the most advanced segregation of duties (SoD) policy subsystem on the market. It actually works, whereas SoD policy checks in competitor IAM products can be bypassed in cases where there are nested roles and/or nested groups.
The Identity Manager SoD policy subsystem supports:
- Policy definition:
- An SoD rule is defined as a toxic sets of entitlements.
- Entitlements that participate in the SoD rule may themselves be roles, login IDs on specified target systems or membership in specific security groups.
- Users who have at least N of the M SoD entitlements are considered to be in violation.
This is a very general model. It supports rules such as "No user shall belong to more than 2 of these 30 groups."
- Approved exceptions:
- Users may be allowed to violate SoD rules, so long as an authorized person has approved the violation.
- Access certification is used to periodically renew approved SoD exceptions.
This is a practical model. It allows organizations to knowingly violate rules where there is a strong business reason to do so and where suitable compensating controls are in place.
- Proactive enforcement:
- SoD policy is an integral part of workflow in Identity Manager.
- Change requests that pass through Identity Manager workflow
- Satisfy all SoD rules (i.e., violate none); or
- Include a request for an approved exception to every violated rule.
- Requesters -- via the Identity Manager UI, API or automation system -- simply cannot ask for violations without also asking for an approved exception.
SoD should be proactive rather than after-the-fact, wherever possible. This is supported by Identity Manager.
- Reporting on out-of-band and pre-existing violations:
- It is still possible to have users with entitlements that violate
- Pre-existing conditions, where a user violated the SoD rule before Identity Manager was implemented or the rule was defined.
- Out of band changes, made using administrative tools and login IDs outside of Identity Manager.
- In these cases, there is no general way for Identity Manager to know which of the offending entitlements is inappropriate, so it cannot automatically remediate the violating users.
- Instead, Identity Manager includes reports to identify violating users and help security staff make appropriate remediating changes.
SoD reporting is the defense of last resort.
- It is still possible to have users with entitlements that violate SoD:
- Deep inspection:
Roles can be nested into other roles. Groups can include among their members other groups. The result of these two hierarchies is that an SoD policy may be defined at one level of a hierarchy of roles or groups, but a violation may take place at another level of the hierarchy. The Identity Manager SoD policy mechanism decomposes roles and locates parent groups in order to reliably detect policy violations. Competitor IAM products fail to find such such violations.